Re: [Not a] Bugette in UART examples
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2019 12:29 pm
Well, we do have some requests...
To be fair, it also took me a while to be okay with 'newer' things like 'for (int i=0;'. But in the end, it's added to the standard for a good reason and I'm not sure if I even want to write anything for a non-C99-compliant compiler ever again (had some bad experience with the Rabbit CPU's 'almost-C') so I decided to just go with it. I can imagine that the culture in an entire company may be a bit slower to shift, though.
To be fair, it also took me a while to be okay with 'newer' things like 'for (int i=0;'. But in the end, it's added to the standard for a good reason and I'm not sure if I even want to write anything for a non-C99-compliant compiler ever again (had some bad experience with the Rabbit CPU's 'almost-C') so I decided to just go with it. I can imagine that the culture in an entire company may be a bit slower to shift, though.